meladoodle:

ladies laaaaadies, theres plenty of me to go around *detaches arm* thats for you Brenda

yesbreathingisnice:

he looks so pleased with himself and that makes me happy

vandrare:

european-traditionalist:

someofmybestfriendsarewhite:

der-prinz-aus-stahl:

beautyandthepie:

der-prinz-aus-stahl:

someofmybestfriendsarewhite:

der-prinz-aus-stahl:

someofmybestfriendsarewhite:

irishnationalist:

wonderbaar:

collowrath:

femmefatalesshai:

european-traditionalist:

dinklebird:

Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea tells the story of Asylum Seekers seeking asylum in Australia, watching this may just change your perception of just who these people are. This documentary focuses not on the political ‘issues’ that the media and politicians like to focus on but the stories of these human beings who have gone through so much. 

http://deepblueseafilm.com/buy-digital-download/

Why should we care? Why don’t they go to the closet country to them that already has a similar culture and religious beliefs? What do you think would happen if a boat full of 100 people showed up in their countries? Do you think they’d welcome you with open arms?

And why should we care about YOUR WHITE ASSES?

No one said you should. I love arguing with black people, holy crap.

You “should” care because we’re all human, and if we said something like /that/ to you you’d classify it under harassment. Stop being mean.

The basic problem with universalist morality is that if it’s not reciprocated, it doesn’t work. Why don’t these people go to Indonesia? Cos they haven’t signed international laws on asylum, they don’t care for these people regardless of their membership in the human race.

Even countries that are signatories to these laws, like Japan, let in scantly few refugees. These people merely prey on Australian largesse (or rather the largesse of the political class of Australia, most regular Australians don’t want them)

And if Australians were ever persecuted these people would shut the door in their face as well. The “brotherhood of mankind” is not a universally held concept, merely universalist in morality. There is no prescription that anyone must follow this morality, you’ve simply been raised in it, and don’t question it.

I care about those asylum seekers.

"That sucks".

"It must suck being an asylum seeker".

What do you want? What’s the purpose of the documentary? To humanise asylum seekers. Cool, will the next documentary show the human side of Australians who oppose asylum seekers?

The majority of our illegal immigration comes from South and East Asians getting their degree at uni and then choosing to overstay their visa because “lol fuck going home”, and also British people who come on holiday and then do the same thing the Asians did. This is still a tiny number when you compare it to those who come every year that are legal immigrants.

Of asylum seekers, those who try and get in via the “six months in a leaky boat” option (i.e the illegal one) make up such a tiny amount of asylum seekers as a whole, compared with those who enter legally via plane or whatever. Even knowing this, asylum seekers are still a tiny amount of the immigrants we actually receive.

Even though approximately a quarter of our population was born overseas, remember that over 10% of us were born in Europe, New Zealand, Canada or the United States. That doesn’t instantly mean “white” but it’s astronomically likely that it does.

I’d have absolutely no problem with asylum seekers or “boat people” if our intake of regular immigrants wasn’t ~200,000 every year.

The slogan “Fuck off we’re full” fits, because we’re going to get full if that goes on at those numbers. The only way to make more space, really, is to build something like Dubai in the middle of the desert, or to bulldoze farming land for apartment buildings.

One new tactic I’ve seen crop up is “you’re not full because only X% of your land is inhabited”. Who are they to tell us how full our countries need to be? We don’t want our countries to be jam-packed like China and India. If a family of four lives in a house with five bedrooms, that’s their business.

That one is bullshit because the % of our land that is inhabited is LITERALLY THE ONLY PART OF OUR LAND THAT IS INHABITABLE.

Is the other X% the part that’s filled with all the scary shit that lives in Australia?

no it’s desert

I wasn’t just talking about Australia. They say it to the UK as well, to any white country that says it’s full. As if we have an obligation to bulldoze the country and build more cities because immigrants want to live here. Like fuck we do, we like having nice open spaces. 

The basic problem with universalist morality is that if it’s not reciprocated, it doesn’t work. Why don’t these people go to Indonesia? Cos they haven’t signed international laws on asylum, they don’t care for these people regardless of their membership in the human race.

Even countries that are signatories to these laws, like Japan, let in scantly few refugees. These people merely prey on Australian largesse (or rather the largesse of the political class of Australia, most regular Australians don’t want them)

And if Australians were ever persecuted these people would shut the door in their face as well. The “brotherhood of mankind” is not a universally held concept, merely universalist in morality. There is no prescription that anyone must follow this morality, you’ve simply been raised in it, and don’t question it.”

PERFECT PERFECT PERFECT.

The hippies/Middle class White people just don’t get it. You are the only people that believe in a world wide brotherhood. Other races of people don’t give a shit. They know your all idiots and will exploit your delusional beliefs. They don’t practice any sort of “anti-racism” or “egalitarian” bullshit in their own countries. These are White ideas that only White people believe in.

Those who wish to hold the faith of the ‘universalists’ do so at their peril and detriment only it’s not only to their detriment or peril, that will be the fate of what’s left of the societies in which they dwell - festering the fruit from within. A fruit which grew from a labor that was not sown by their hands.

In time something will give - by the flood of the rivers of blood, cleanse.

Poverty tourism is only the most recent form of the evolution of the particular fascination (stand well back, but let us peer at you, curiously) that the upper classes have with the lower. The current mutation of poverty tourism includes a well meaning, upper/middle class, first world people, who are for whatever reason turned onto going to Africa (and it’s always Africa, isn’t it) to learn about how the starving children that show up on their TVs and their destitute parents live.

From Kennedy Odede, a Kenyan university student:

“Slum tourism has its advocates, who say it promotes social awareness. And it’s good money, which helps the local economy.

But it’s not worth it. Slum tourism turns poverty into entertainment, something that can be momentarily experienced and then escaped from. People think they’ve really “seen” something — and then go back to their lives and leave me, my family and my community right where we were before”

Not feeling the nightmare thing tbh

jaclcfrost:

[gently rests hand on character’s cheek] i love you but you’re such an ass